4.5 Article

Achilles and patellar tendinopathy display opposite changes in elastic properties: A shear wave elastography study

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sms.12986

关键词

Aixplorer; elasticity; jumper's knee; musculo-skeletal; pain; rehabilitation; stiffness; ultrasound

资金

  1. University of Queensland Postdoctoral Fellowship for Women
  2. France-Australia Science Innovation Collaboration
  3. French Ministry of Sport [17-R-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To compare tendon elastic and structural properties of healthy individuals with those with Achilles or patellar tendinopathy. Sixty-seven participants (22 Achilles tendinopathy, 17 patellar tendinopathy, and 28 healthy controls) were recruited between March 2015 and March 2016. Shear wave velocity (SWV), an index of tissue elastic modulus, and tendon thickness were measured bilaterally at mid-tendon and insertional regions of Achilles and patellar tendons by an examiner blinded to group. Analysis of covariance, adjusted for age, body mass index, and sex was used to compare differences in tendon thickness and SWV between the two tendinopathy groups (relative to controls) and regions. Tendon thickness was included as a covariate for analysis of SWV. Compared to controls, participants with Achilles tendinopathy had lower SWV at the distal insertion (Mean difference MD; 95% CI: -1.56; -2.49 to -0.62m/s; P<.001) and greater thickness at the mid-tendon (MD 0.19; 0.05-0.33cm; P=.007). Compared to controls, participants with patellar tendinopathy had higher SWV at both regions (MD 1.25; 0.40-2.10m/s; P=.005) and greater thickness proximally (MD 0.17; 0.06-0.29cm; P=.003). Compared to controls, participants with Achilles and patellar tendinopathy displayed lower Achilles tendon elastic modulus and higher patellar tendon elastic modulus, respectively. More research is needed to explore whether maturation, aging, or chronic load underlie these findings and whether current management programs for Achilles and patellar tendinopathy need to be tailored to the tendon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据