4.5 Article

Localization of muscle damage within the quadriceps femoris induced by different types of eccentric exercises

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sms.12880

关键词

downhill walking; knee extension; maximal strength; muscle soreness; squat; T-2-MRI

资金

  1. TOBE MAKI Scholarship Foundation [16-JC-005]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15J03228, 17J02997, 16H01870] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined localization of muscle damage within the quadriceps femoris induced by different types of eccentric exercises by using transverse relaxation time (T-2)-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty-three young males performed either of the following three exercises: single-joint eccentric contraction of the knee extensors (KE), eccentric squat (S), or downhill walking (DW) (n=11/exercise). KE and S consisted of 5-setx10-lowering of 90% one-repetition maximum load. DW was performed for 60minutes with -10% slope, 6km/h velocity, and 20% body mass load carried. At pre- and 24-, 48-, and 72-hours post-exercise, T-2-MRI was scanned and T-2 values for the rectus femoris (RF), vastus intermedius (VI), vastus lateralis (VL), and vastus medialis (VM) at proximal, middle, and distal sites were calculated. Additionally, soreness felt when static pressure was applied to these sites and maximal isometric knee extension torque were measured. Maximal torque significantly (P<.05) decreased (7%-15%) at 24-48hours after all exercises. T-2 significantly increased (3%-9%) at 24-72hours after all exercises, with heterogeneities within the muscles found in each exercise. Effect size and peak change of T-2, as well as soreness, overall indicated that the proximal RF after KE and middle VM after S and DW were most affected by these exercises. The VL did not show any significant T-2 increase after all exercises. These results suggest that muscle damage specifically localizes at the proximal RF by KE and at the middle VM by S and DW, while the VL is least damaged regardless of the exercises.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据