4.8 Review

Occurrence, Fate, Behavior and Ecotoxicological State of Phthalates in Different Environmental Matrices

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 7, 页码 4019-4035

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es505233b

关键词

-

资金

  1. MERMEX/MISTRALS
  2. Labex OT-Med
  3. PACA region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because of their large and widespread application, phthalates or phthalic acid esters (PAEs) are ubiquitous in all the environmental compartements. They have been Widely detected throughout the worldwide environment. Indoor air where people Spend 65-90% of their time is also highly contaminated by various PAEs released from plastics, consumer products as well as ambient suspended particulate matter. Because of their widespread application, PAEs are the most coramon chemicals that humans are in contact with daily. Based on various exposure mechanisms, including the ingestion of food, drinking water, dust/soil, ait inhalation and dermal exposure the daily intake of PAEs may reach values as high as 70 pg/kg/day. PAEs are involved in endocrine disrupting effects, namely, upon reproductive physiology in different species of fish and mammals. They also present a variety of additional toxic effects for many other species including terrestrial and aquatic fauna and flora. Therefore, their presence in the environment has attracted considerable attention due to their potential impacts on ecosystem functioning and on public health. This paper is a synthesis of the extensive literature data on behavior, transport, fate and ecotaxicological state of PAEs in environmental matrices: air, water, sediment, sludge, Wastewater, soil, and biota. First, the origins and physicochemical properties of PAEs that control the behavior, transport and fate in the environment are reviewed. Second, the compilation of data on transport and fate, adverse environmental and human health effects, legislation, restrictions, and ecotoxicological state of the environment based or PAEs is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据