4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

In silico prediction of multiple-category classification model for cytochrome P450 inhibitors and non-inhibitors using machine-learning method

期刊

SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 863-874

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2017.1399925

关键词

Cytochrome P450; classification; machine-learning; multiple-category modelling; descriptors; inhibitors; non-inhibitors

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2017R1A2B4010084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme superfamily is involved in phase I metabolism which chemically modifies a variety of substrates via oxidative reactions to make them more water-soluble and easier to eliminate. Inhibition of these enzymes leads to undesirable effects, including toxic drug accumulations and adverse drug-drug interactions. Hence, it is necessary to develop in silico models that can predict the inhibition potential of compounds for different CYP isoforms. This study focused on five major CYP isoforms, including CYP1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4, that are responsible for more than 90% of the metabolism of clinical drugs. The main aim of this study is to develop a multiple-category classification model (MCM) for the major CYP isoforms using a Laplacian-modified naive Bayesian method. The dataset composed of more than 4500 compounds was collected from the PubChem Bioassay database. VolSurf+ descriptors and FCFP_8 fingerprint were used as input features to build classification models. The results demonstrated that the developed MCM using Laplacian-modified naive Bayesian method was successful in classifying inhibitors and non-inhibitors for each CYP isoform. Moreover, the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity values for both training and test sets were above 80% and also yielded satisfactory area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Matthews correlation coefficient values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据