3.8 Article

Consumption of Contaminated Seafood in an Environmental Justice Community: A Qualitative and Spatial Analysis of Fishing Controls

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 6-14

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/env.2017.0010

关键词

qualitative; GIS; risk perception; fish consumption advisories; PCBs

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences' (NIEHS) Superfund Research Program [5 P42 ES007381]
  2. NIEHS training grant [T32 ES014562]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New Bedford Harbor (NBH) in Massachusetts was listed as a Superfund site in 1983 due to extensive contamination with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from industrial pollution. Since 1999, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has posted signage and fencing in areas around NBH to discourage fishing activity, along with distributing consumption advisories locally. This exploratory study combined qualitative and geographic information system methods to assess fishing activity, signage, and awareness of the PCB contamination and consumption advisories among people fishing at NBH. We conducted interviews with fishermen along a portion of NBH (n = 12), and we recorded and geocoded observations and locations of fishing activity (n = 54) and fishing related signage (n = 53). Despite our limited sample size, our findings are similar to those of larger quantitative studies: advisories are not reaching vulnerable fishing populations. While all participants stated that their reasons for fishing were recreational, two-thirds reported that their catch was eaten. People who ate or shared their catch for consumption were less aware of signage, the advisory, and the contamination than nonconsumers. Most signage lacked visuals, the consumption messaging was not consistent, and was limited to English, Spanish, and Portuguese, which may not be sufficient to reach newer immigrants. This pilot study identified successes and shortcomings of the current efforts by EPA to reduce consumption of PCB contaminated seafood in this environmental justice community. Finally, we offer lessons learned and suggestions for future research on a larger scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据