3.8 Article

Using locally produced photovoltaic energy to charge electric vehicles

期刊

COMPUTER SCIENCE-RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 33, 期 1-2, 页码 37-47

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00450-017-0345-8

关键词

Energy; Mobility; Sustainability; Photovoltaics; Electric vehicles

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [NRP 71]
  2. Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) within the Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research (SCCER) Mobility
  3. Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) within FURIES (Future Swiss Electrical Infrastructure)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mobility in Switzerland currently consumes about 35% of the total energy demand. While internal combustion engines still generate most of it, the increasing number of electric vehicles changes the landscape by decoupling energy production from consumption. This allows using more sustainable energy sources, such as photovoltaics (PV), hydroelectric power plants or wind turbines. In the past years, the number of PV installations has grown rapidly in Switzerland. It is expected that PV has the highest growth potential of all renewable energy sources. Solar panels are especially interesting, as they can be installed on most buildings, which distributes the electricity production. However, due to frequent fluctuations in production, PV poses a challenge for the existing power grid. It is unclear to what extent PV production can be increased without the need for extensions of the power grid, such as additional transmission lines or storage capabilities. Electric vehicles could be used to consume fluctuating electricity production. In this paper, we study the effects of using locally produced photovoltaic power to recharge electric vehicles of commuters in individual Swiss municipalities. Such an analysis not only gives us indications of the potentials and limits of using photovoltaics to satisfy mobility energy demands, but can also be used to better direct subsidies and plan the electrical grid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据