4.8 Article

Impacts of the Minamata Convention on Mercury Emissions and Global Deposition from Coal-Fired Power Generation in Asia

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 9, 页码 5326-5335

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00074

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [1053648, 1313755]
  2. MIT SSRC Stokes Fellowship
  3. MIT J.H. and E.V. Wade fund
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1053648] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. ICER
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1313755] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explore implications of the United Nations Minamata Convention on Mercury for emissions from Asian coal-fired power generation, and resulting changes to deposition worldwide by 2050. We use engineering analysis, document analysis, and interviews to construct plausible technology scenarios consistent with the Convention. We translate these scenarios into emissions projections for 2050, and use the GEOS-Chem model to calculate global mercury deposition. Where technology requirements in the Convention are flexibly defined, under a global energy and development scenario that relies heavily on coal, we project similar to 90 and 150 Mg.y(-1) of avoided power sector emissions for China and India, respectively, in 2050, compared to a scenario in which only current technologies are used. Benefits of this avoided emissions growth are primarily captured regionally, with projected changes in annual average gross deposition over China and India similar to 2 and 13 mu g.m(-2) lower, respectively, than the current technology case. Stricter, but technologically feasible, mercury control requirements in both countries could lead to a combined additional 170 Mg.y(-1) avoided emissions. Assuming only current technologies but a global transition away from coal avoids 6% and 36% more emissions than this strict technology scenario under heavy coal use for China and India, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据