4.5 Article

Highly Selective and Active Pd-In/three-dimensional Graphene with Special Structure for Electroreduction CO2 to Formate

期刊

ELECTROANALYSIS
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 84-93

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/elan.201700525

关键词

Electrochemical reduction; Carbon dioxide; 3D-graphene; Pd-In bimental; Formate

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015ZCQ-HJ-02]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [8172035]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21373032, 2018ZX07101005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formate on carbon based electrodes is known to suffer from low electrochemical reaction activity and product selectivity. Pd/three-dimensional graphene (Pd/3D-RGO), In/3D-RGO and Pd-In/3D-RGO for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 were prepared by a mild method that combines chemical and hydrothermal. The metal/3D-graphenes (metal/3D-RGO) were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Cyclic voltammetry and the ion chromatography were performed to investigate the electrochemical performance of the metal/3D-RGO. The morphology and dispersion of metal/3D-RGO are 3D structure with amount of interconnected pores with metal NPs loading on the fold. And the Pd-0.5-In-0.5/3D-RGO show excellent surface performance with well dispersion and smallest particle size (12.8nm). XPS reveal that binding energy of Pd (In) NPs is shifted to negative energy, for the metal lose electrons in metal and combine with C, which is demonstrated in the HNO3 experiment. The peak potential of Pd-0.5-In-0.5/3D-RGO is -0.70V (vs. Ag/AgCl), which is more positive than In-1.0/3D-RGO (-0.73V) and Pd-1.0/3D-RGO (-1.2V). The highest faradaic efficiency (85.3%) happens in Pd-0.5-In-0.5/3D-RGO at -1.6V vs. Ag/AgCl. In these experiments, the special structure that metal NPs combine with C and the bimetal NPs give a direction to convert CO2 to formate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据