4.3 Article

Transition and post-transition metals in exhaled breath condensate

期刊

JOURNAL OF BREATH RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/aaa214

关键词

lung; transition elements; iron; zinc; metals

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES010126] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Intramural EPA [EPA999999] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water vapor in expired air, as well as dispersed non-volatile components, condense onto a cooler surface after exiting the respiratory tract. This exhaled breath condensate (EBC) provides a dilute sampling of the epithelial lining fluid. Accordingly, the collection of EBC imparts a capacity to provide biomarkers of injury preceding clinical disease. Concentrations of transition and post-transition metals in EBC are included among these endpoints. Iron and zinc are the metals with the highest concentration and are measurable in all EBC samples from healthy subjects; other metals are most frequently either at or below the level of detection in this group. Gender, age, and smoking can impact EBC metal concentrations in healthy subjects. EBC metal concentrations among patients diagnosed with particular lung diseases (e.g. asthma, chronic obstructive disease, and interstitial lung disease) have been of research interest but no definite pattern of involvement has been delineated. Studies of occupationally exposed workers confirm significant exposure to specific metals, but such EBC metal measurements frequently provide evidence redundant with environmental sampling. Measurements of metal concentrations in EBC remain a research tool into metal homeostasis in the respiratory tract and participation of metals in disease pathogenesis. The quantification of metal concentrations in EBC is currently not reliable for clinical use in either supporting or determining any diagnosis. Issues that must be addressed prior to the use of EBC metal measurements include the establishment of both standardized collection and measurement techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据