4.8 Article

Death Dilemma and Organism Recovery in Ecotoxicology

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 16, 页码 10136-10146

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03079

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021-119795]
  2. SETAC-CEFIC-LRI Innovative Science Award
  3. Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) [09.033.PJ/I362-1602, 09.0012.PJ]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021-119795] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Why do some individuals survive after exposure to chemicals while others die? Either, the tolerance threshold is distributed among the individuals in a population, and its exceedance leads to certain death, or all individuals share the same threshold above which death occurs stochastically. The previously published General Unified Threshold model of Survival (GUTS) established a mathematical relationship between the two assumptions. According to this model stochastic death would result in systematically faster compensation and damage repair mechanisms than individual tolerance. Thus, we face a circular conclusion dilemma because inference about the death mechanism is inherently linked to the speed of damage recovery. We provide empirical evidence that the stochastic death model consistently infers much faster toxicodynamic recovery than the individual tolerance model. Survival data can be explained by either, slower damage recovery and a wider individual tolerance distribution, or faster damage recovery paired with a narrow tolerance distribution. The toxicodynamic model parameters exhibited meaningful patterns in chemical space, which is why we suggest toxicodynamic model parameters as novel phenotypic anchors for in vitro to in vivo toxicity extrapolation. GUTS appears to be a promising refinement of traditional survival curve analysis and dose response models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据