4.4 Article

Increased proportion of mature oocytes with sustained-release growth hormone treatment in poor responders: a prospective randomized controlled study

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
卷 297, 期 3, 页码 791-796

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4613-4

关键词

Growth hormone; Fertilization in vitro; Oocytes

资金

  1. LG Life Sciences, Seoul, Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supplementation of growth hormone (GH) during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) has been suggested to improve ovarian response. Despite potential benefits in poor responders, multiple injections of GH during COS are inconvenient. We conducted a randomized controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sustained-release human GH in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel study. Infertile women who satisfied the Bologna criteria for poor responders were randomized into GH treatment and control groups. The treatment group received a sustained-release GH (Eutropin Plus(A (R)) 20 mg) three times before and during COS (mid-luteal, late luteal, and menstrual cycle day 2). The baseline characteristics and IVF outcomes were compared between the two groups. A total of 127 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 39.6 years and mean anti-Mullerian hormone level was 0.6 ng/ml. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between GH treatment and control groups. The number of follicles on the human chorionic gonadotropin triggering day (3.1 +/- 2.3 vs. 2.4 +/- 1.6, P = 0.043) and the proportion of metaphase II oocytes (67.5 vs. 52.3%, P = 0.030) were higher in the GH group than in controls. The percentage of clinical and ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage was not different between the two groups. Supplementation of sustained-release GH before and during COS improved ovarian response, with an increase in mature oocytes in poor responders. Further studies are needed to ensure this benefit in general infertility patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据