4.8 Article

Facet-Dependent Catalytic Activity of Nanosheet-Assembled Bismuth Oxyiodide Microspheres in Degradation of Bisphenol A

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 10, 页码 6240-6248

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00626

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21425729]
  2. Key Project of Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (973 Program) [2014CB932001]
  3. Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission [13JCZDJC35900, 15JCZDJC40000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

\ Photocatalysts with,different exposed facets often exhibit different photochemical performances, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we synthesized two nanosheet-assembled bismuth oxyiodide (BiOI) microspheres with exposed (110) and (001). facets; respectively, to further investigate facet-dependent photo-catalytic activity. Our experimental results showed that the BiOI,microspheres with exposed (110) facets exhibited much greater catalytic activity than the BiOI ,microspheres with exposed (001) facets in the degradatron of bisphenol A under visible light irradiation. Density functional theory calculation revealed that the (HQ) facets can adsorb -a greater amount of O-2 and, thus, form more O-2. and OH, radicals than the (001) facets. The electron spin resonance spectrostopy and radical scavenging experiments verified that the BiOI microspheres with exposed (110) facets could produce a, greater amount of radicals than the BiOI microspheres with exposed (001) facets,: and more importantly, between the two BiOI products, only the BLOT microspheres with exposed (110) facets could,generate OH radicals directly. The facet-dependent radical formation mechanisms were previously unideritified. The findings Of this study may have important implications for the understanding of the facet-dependent photochemical performance of photocatalysts and the design of novel catalytic materials with inorganic nanostructures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据