4.6 Article

Inherited DNA lesions determine G1 duration in the next cell cycle

期刊

CELL CYCLE
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 24-32

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1383578

关键词

53BP1; cancer; cell-to-cell variation; DNA damage response; G1; S transition; heterogeneity; Replication stress; tumor suppressor protein p53; under-replicated DNA

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [PP00P3_150690]
  2. European Research Council [Horizon 2020 ERC-2016-STG 714326 DiVineGenoMe]
  3. Novartis Foundation for Medical-Biological Research [16B078]
  4. Swiss Foundation to Combat Cancer (Stiftung zur Krebsbekampfung)
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P3_150690] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Replication stress is a major source of DNA damage and an important driver of cancer development. Replication intermediates that occur upon mild forms of replication stress frequently escape cell cycle checkpoints and can be transmitted through mitosis into the next cell cycle. The consequences of such inherited DNA lesions for cell fate and survival are poorly understood. By using time-lapse microscopy and quantitative image-based cytometry to simultaneously monitor inherited DNA lesions marked by the genome caretaker protein 53BP1 and cell cycle progression, we show that inheritance of 53BP1-marked lesions from the previous S-phase is associated with a prolonged G1 duration in the next cell cycle. These results suggest that cell-to-cell variation in S-phase commitment is determined, at least partially, by the amount of replication-born inherited DNA damage in individual cells. We further show that loss of the tumor suppressor protein p53 overrides replication stress-induced G1 prolongation and allows S-phase entry with excessive amounts of inherited DNA lesions. Thus, replication stress and p53 loss may synergize during cancer development by promoting cell cycle re-entry with unrepaired mutagenic DNA lesions originating from the previous cell cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据