4.5 Article

Differential flow improvements after valve replacements in bicuspid aortic valve disease: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment

期刊

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12968-018-0431-5

关键词

Magnetic resonance imaging; Aortic disease; Bicuspid aortic valve; Aortic valve replacement; 4D flow

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Programme
  4. Oxford British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence
  5. MRC [G0900883] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. British Heart Foundation [FS/12/14/29354, FS/10/43/28415] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0900883] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10005] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Abnormal aortic flow patterns in bicuspid aortic valve disease (BAV) may be partly responsible for the associated aortic dilation. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) may normalize flow patterns and potentially slow the concomitant aortic dilation. We therefore sought to examine differences in flow patterns post AVR. Methods: Ninety participants underwent 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 30 BAV patients with prior AVR (11 mechanical, 10 bioprosthetic, 9 Ross procedure), 30 BAV patients with a native aortic valve and 30 healthy subjects. Results: The majority of subjects with mechanical AVR or Ross showed normal flow pattern (73% and 67% respectively) with near normal rotational flow values (7.2 +/- 3.9 and 10.6 +/- 10.5 mm(2)/ms respectively vs 3.8 +/- 3.1 mm(2)/s for healthy subjects; both p > 0.05); and reduced in-plane wall shear stress (0.19 +/- 0.13 N/m(2) for mechanical AVR vs. 0. 40 +/- 0.28 N/m(2) for native BAV, p < 0.05). In contrast, all subjects with a bioprosthetic AVR had abnormal flow patterns (mainly marked right-handed helical flow), with comparable rotational flow values to native BAV (20.7 +/- 8.8 mm(2)/ms and 26.6 +/- 16.6 mm(2)/ms respectively, p > 0.05), and a similar pattern for wall shear stress. Data before and after AVR (n = 16) supported these findings: mechanical AVR showed a significant reduction in rotational flow (30.4 +/- 16.3 -> 7.3 +/- 4.1 mm(2)/ms; p < 0.05) and in-plane wall shear stress (0.47 +/- 0.20 -> 0.20 +/- 0.13 N/m(2); p < 0.05), whereas these parameters remained similar in the bioprosthetic AVR group. Conclusions: Abnormal flow patterns in BAV disease tend to normalize after mechanical AVR or Ross procedure, in contrast to the remnant abnormal flow pattern after bioprosthetic AVR. This may in part explain different aortic growth rates post AVR in BAV observed in the literature, but requires confirmation in a prospective study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据