4.8 Article

Dynamic Coupling of Iron, Manganese, and Phosphorus Behavior in Water and Sediment of Shallow Ice-Covered Eutrophic Lakes

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 16, 页码 9758-9767

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02057

关键词

-

资金

  1. Vermont EPSCoR
  2. National Science Foundation [EPS-1101317, IIA-1330446]
  3. BBSRC [BB/K018167/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K018167/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Office Of The Director
  6. Office of Integrative Activities [1101317, 1330446] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decreasing duration and occurrence of northern hemisphere ice cover due to recent climate warming is well-documented; however, biogeochemical dynamics underneath the ice are poorly understood. We couple time-series analyses of water column and sediment water interface (SWI) geochemistry with hydrodynamic data to develop a holistic model of iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and phosphorus (P) behavior underneath the ice of a shallow eutrophic freshwater bay. During periods of persistent subfreezing temperatures, a highly reactive pool of dissolved and colloidal Fe, Mn, and P develops over time in surface sediments and bottom waters due to reductive dissolution of Fe/Mn(oxy)hydroxides below the SVVI. Redox dynamics are driven by benthic O-2 consumption, limited air water exchange of oxygen due to ice cover, and minimal circulation. During thaw events, the concentration, distribution and size partitioning of all species changes, with the highest concentrations of P and truly dissolved Fe near the water column surface, and a relatively well-mixed truly dissolved Mn and colloidal Fe profile due to the influx of geo chemically distinct river water and increased circulation. The partitioning and flux of trace metals and phosphorus beneath the ice is dynamic, and heavily influenced by climate-dependent physical processes that vary in both time and space.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据