4.7 Article

Creep Behavior of Intact and Cracked Limestone Under Multi-Level Loading and Unloading Cycles

期刊

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 1409-1424

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-017-1187-1

关键词

Creep behavior; Creep test; Multi-level loading and unloading cycles; Maokou limestone

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51274097, 51434006, 51374104]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan province [2015JJ2067]
  3. Shanghai Thousand Talents Program
  4. Open Projects of State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, CUMT [SKLCRSM16KF12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of triaxial creep tests were carried out on intact and cracked Maokou limestone specimens under multi-level loading and unloading cycles. A new data processing algorithm is proposed to analyze the experimental data and divide the total strain into instantaneous and creep strains, with the instantaneous strain consisting of instantaneous elastic and plastic strains and the creep strain consisting of viscoelastic and visco-plastic strains. The results show that the viscoelastic strain converges to a certain value with time, but the visco-plastic strain keeps increasing with time, although both tend to increase with higher deviatoric stress. The ratio of the visco-plastic strain to the total creep strain also tends to increase when the deviatoric stress is higher. The steady-state creep strain rate increases with higher deviatoric stress or lower confining pressure, and the relation between the steady-state creep strain rate and the deviatoric stress can be well described by an exponential expression. The results also show that the preexisting cracks in the limestone have a great effect on its creep properties. At the same confining pressure and deviatoric stress, the cracked limestone shows larger instantaneous and creep strains (especially visco-plastic strains), longer duration of primary creep, and a higher steady-state creep strain rate than the intact limestone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据