4.7 Article

The Influence of Temperature on Mode I Fracture Toughness and Fracture Characteristics of Sandstone

期刊

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
卷 50, 期 8, 页码 2007-2019

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-017-1226-y

关键词

Sandstone; Fracture toughness; Semicircular bend; Fracture crack shape; Fracture analysis

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB239200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51574173]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the influence of temperature on the mode I fracture toughness of sandstone using semicircular bend specimens. Fracture characteristics were studied using scanning electron microscopy and other means. The results showed that temperature influenced fracturing in three stages along a temperature gradient. In the low-temperature stage (20-100 A degrees C), fracture toughness increases slowly, with a total increase of approximately 11%. At the medium-temperature stage (100-500 A degrees C), fracture toughness decreases slowly, at a rate of approximately 18%. During the high-temperature stage (500-800 A degrees C), fracture toughness was reduced by approximately 44%. The mode I fracture toughness has a clear temperature threshold (500-600 A degrees C). Below this threshold, the fracture toughness decreases slowly. When the temperature threshold is reached, the fracture toughness decreases sharply. The sharp decrease is mainly caused by the creation of a fragmentation structure. The sandstone experiences more transgranular fracture mechanics in the low-temperature stage compared to the high-temperature stage. Above 100 A degrees C, the mechanisms include transgranular fracturing, intergranular fracturing, thermal cracking, and mutual coupling fracturing. When the temperature exceeds 500 A degrees C, several different fragmentation structures are seen. This research study provides significant data to evaluate fracture characteristics and rock safety and stability after heat treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据