4.8 Article

Effects of Exposure to WwTW Effluents over Two Generations on Sexual Development and Breeding in Roach Rutilus rutilus

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 21, 页码 12994-13002

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03777

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC) [NE/G019355/1, NE/K004263/1]
  2. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, U.K
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NBAF010003, NE/K004263/1, NE/G02037X/1, NE/G019355/1, NE/K004581/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [NBAF010003, NE/G02037X/1, NE/G019355/1, NE/K004581/1, NE/K004263/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to environmental estrogens in wastewater treatment works (WwTW) effluents induces feminized responses in male fish, including the development of eggs in male testes. However, the impacts on the offspring of exposed fish are not well understood. In this study, we examined whether roach (Rutilus rutilus) from mothers that had been exposed to an undiluted WwT1AT effluent from early life to sexual maturity had altered susceptibility to gonadal feminization and an impaired capacity to reproduce. For males from both WwTW effluent exposed mothers and dilution water exposed mothers, effluent exposure for up to 3 years and 9 months induced feminized male gonads, although the intersex condition was relatively mild. There was no difference in the severity of gonadal feminization in roach derived from either WwTW effluent exposed or dilution water exposed mothers. Furthermore, a breeding study revealed that roach with effluent-exposed mothers reproduced with an equal success as roach with mothers exposed to clean water. Roach exposed to the effluent for 3 years in this study were able to reproduce successfully. Our findings provide no evidence for impacts of WwTW effluent exposure on reproduction or gonadal disruption in roach down the female germ line and add to existing evidence that male roach with a mild intersex condition are able to breed competitively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据