4.7 Article

Cellulose nanofibers from residues to improve linting and mechanical properties of recycled paper

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 1339-1351

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-017-1618-x

关键词

Cellulose nanofibers; Linting; Agroforest residues; Recycled paper; High filler-loaded paper; Retention and drainage

资金

  1. Economy and Competitiveness Ministry of Spain [CTQ2013-48090-C2-1-R]
  2. International Paper (Fuenlabrada, Spain)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The production of high filler-loaded recycled papers is often affected by high values of linting and low values of strength. In the first case, the accumulation of lint particles from paper's surface on the printing blanket affects the quality of the printed paper and the pressroom's productivity. In the second case, increasing the use of fillers and recycling cycles lead to poor paper strength. Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) are receiving a great deal of attention due to their potential as a reinforcement aid for high filler-loaded papers through filler-fiber interaction and interfiber bonding. It is already proven that high quality CNFs can reduce linting, although their industrial application is limited by their high production cost. The objective of this research is, therefore, to quantify the effect of applying lower grade, more sustainable CNFs on linting phenomena and on the mechanical properties of recycled papers. Eucalyptus, pine and triticale residues were used as cellulose sources, and the CNFs were produced minimizing the chemical pretreatment before homogenization. Addition of 3 wt% of CNFs from pine residues into the recycled paper with 15.7 wt% of total filler reduced linting by 40% and increased tensile strength by 15.1%; further improvements on linting and mechanical properties were achieved at 5 wt%. Moreover, the increase in drainage time can be overcome by the addition of a retention aid, in this case a coagulant-cationic polyacrylamide-bentonite system, commonly used in paper mills.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据