4.7 Review

BET Family Protein BRD4: An Emerging Actor in NFκB Signaling in Inflammation and Cancer

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines6010016

关键词

NF kappa B; BET inhibition; transcription; chromatin looping; acetylation B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

资金

  1. l'INCa 'epigenetique et cancer' program
  2. Societe Francaise d'Hematologie
  3. Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes region under the program 'Annee Recherche' (Masters 2 research training at Bart's Cancer Institute)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NF kappa B (Nuclear Factor-kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) signaling elicits global transcriptional changes by activating cognate promoters and through genome-wide remodeling of cognate regulatory elements called super enhancers. BET (Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal domain) protein family inhibitor studies have implicated BET protein member BRD4 and possibly other BET proteins in NF kappa B-dependent promoter and super-enhancer modulation. Members of the BET protein family are known to bind acetylated chromatin to facilitate access by transcriptional regulators to chromatin, as well as to assist the activity of transcription elongation complexes via CDK9/pTEFb. BET family member BRD4 has been shown to bind non-histone proteins and modulate their activity. One such protein is RELA, the NF kappa B co-activator. Specifically, BRD4 binds acetylated RELA, which increases its transcriptional transactivation activity and stability in the nucleus. In aggregate, this establishes an intimate link between NF kappa B and BET signaling, at least via BRD4. The present review provides a brief overview of the structure and function of BET family proteins and then examines the connections between NF kappa B and BRD4 signaling, using the inflammatory response and cancer cell signaling as study models. We also discuss the potential of BET inhibitors for relief of aberrant NF kappa B signaling in cancer, focusing on non-histone, acetyl-lysine binding functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据