4.7 Article

Direct Visualization of Evaporation in a Two-Dimensional Nanoporous Model for Unconventional Natural Gas

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 1, 期 3, 页码 1332-1338

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.8b00064

关键词

evaporation; Knudsen flow; vapor transport; nanoporous; nanofluidics; shale gas

资金

  1. Schlumberger Canada Ltd.
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada through a Collaborative Research and Development Grant [477200-14]
  3. Alberta Innovates [3189]
  4. E.W.R Steacie Memorial Fellowship [492246-2016]
  5. Discovery Grants program [2015-06701]
  6. Discovery Accelerator [477898-2015]
  7. Canada Research Chairs program [230931]
  8. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  9. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  10. Ontario Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evaporation at the nanoscale is critical to many natural and synthetic systems including rapidly emerging unconventional oil and gas production from nanoporous shale reservoirs. During extraction processes, hydrocarbons confined to nanoscopic pores (ranging from one to a few hundred nanometers in size) can undergo phase change as pressure is reduced. Here, we directly observe evaporation in two-dimensional (2D) nanoporous media at the sub-10 nm scale. Using an experimental procedure that mimics pressure drawdown during shale oil/gas production, our results show that evaporation takes place at pressures significantly lower than predictions from the Kelvin equation (maximum deviation of 11%). We probe evaporation dynamics as a function of superheat and find that vapor transport resistance dominates evaporation rate. The transport resistance is made up of both Knudsen and viscous flow effects, with the magnitude of the Knudsen effect being approximately twice that of the viscous effects here. We also observe a phenomenon in sub-10 nm confinement wherein lower initial liquid saturation pressures trigger discontinuous evaporation, resulting in faster evaporation rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据