4.8 Article

3D-Printed Biomimetic Super-Hydrophobic Structure for Microdroplet Manipulation and Oil/Water Separation

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201704912

关键词

3D printing; biomimetic structures; droplet manipulation; oil; water separation; super-hydrophobic structures

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI 1335476, CMMI-1151191, CMMI 1663663]
  2. USC's Epstein Institute
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1151191] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomimetic functional surfaces are attracting increasing attention for various technological applications, especially the superhydrophobic surfaces inspired by plant leaves. However, the replication of the complex hierarchical microstructures is limited by the traditional fabrication techniques. In this paper, superhydrophobic micro-scale artificial hairs with eggbeater heads inspired by Salvinia molesta leaf was fabricated by the Immersed surface accumulation three dimensional (3D) printing process. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes were added to the photocurable resins to enhance the surface roughness and mechanical strength of the microstructures. The 3D printed eggbeater surface reveals interesting properties in terms of superhydrophobilicity and petal effect. The results show that a hydrophilic material can macroscopically behave as hydrophobic if a surface has proper microstructured features. The controllable adhesive force (from 23 N to 55 N) can be easily tuned with different number of eggbeater arms for potential applications such as micro hand for droplet manipulation. Furthermore, a new energy-efficient oil/water separation solution based on our biomimetic structures was demonstrated. The results show that the 3D-printed eggbeater structure could have numerous applications, including water droplet manipulation, 3D cell culture, micro reactor, oil spill clean-up, and oil/water separation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据