4.7 Article

Defining the requirements for the pathogenic interaction between mutant calreticulin and MPL in MPN

期刊

BLOOD
卷 131, 期 7, 页码 782-786

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-08-800896

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [R01HL131835]
  2. Damon Runyon clinical investigator award
  3. Starr Cancer Consortium
  4. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS)
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. Academy of Medical Science Springboard Award
  7. Leuka John Goldman Fellowship
  8. Gabrielle's Angel Foundation for Cancer Research
  9. T32 molecular hematology training award (NHLBI)
  10. LLS Special Fellow Award
  11. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [SBF001\\1006] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in calreticulin (CALR) are phenotypic drivers in the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Mechanistic studies have demonstrated that mutant CALR binds to the thrombopoietin receptor MPL, and that the positive electrostatic charge of the mutant CALR C terminus is required for mutant CALR-mediated activation of JAK-STAT signaling. Here we demonstrate that although binding between mutant CALR and MPL is required for mutant CALR to transform hematopoietic cells; binding alone is insufficient for cytokine independent growth. We further show that the threshold of positive charge in the mutant CALR C terminus influences both binding of mutant CALR to MPL and activation of MPL signaling. We find that mutant CALR binds to the extracellular domain of MPL and that 3 tyrosine residues within the intracellular domain of MPL are required to activate signaling. With respect to mutant CALR function, we show that its lectin-dependent function is required for binding to MPL and for cytokine independent growth, whereas its chaperone and polypeptide-binding functionalities are dispensable. Together, our findings provide additional insights into the mechanism of the pathogenic mutant CALR-MPL interaction in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据