4.7 Article

Therapeutic reduction of cell-mediated immunosuppression in mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 423-434

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-017-2090-z

关键词

T regulatory cells; Myeloid-derived suppressor cells; Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; Sezary syndrome; Mycosis fungoides

资金

  1. Research Center Grants for Specialized Programs of Research of Excellence of National Institute of Health, Clinical and Translational Science [P50CA121973]
  2. M01 Award of National Center for Research Resources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor progression is associated with progressive immunosuppression mediated in part by T regulatory cell(s) (Treg) and/or myeloid-derived suppressor cell(s) (MDSC). Development of strategies to reduce populations of immune cells with suppressive function in cancer patients may enable the induction or recovery of immunity against tumor cells, which may limit or reverse disease progression. With a goal of developing Treg and MDSC neutralizing strategies to treat mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SzS), we determined the association between disease stage and suppressor cell populations in patients with MF/SzS, including those responding to therapy. We found elevations in Treg populations, across Treg subtypes, in patients with SzS, and these Treg markedly suppressed proliferation of autologous -CD4(+) CD25(-) responder T cells. Interestingly, while MDSC numbers were not increased in MF/SzS patients, MDSC from patients with stage IB and above produced significantly more reactive oxygen species than those from stage IA MF patients and control cohorts. Therapy with the CD25-targeting agent denileukin diftitox or IFN-alpha 2b was associated with a reduction in Treg numbers or MDSC function, respectively. These studies identify potential mechanisms of action for these therapies and support the development of coordinated strategies targeting both Treg and MDSC activities in patients with MF/SzS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据