期刊
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 393-407出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.01.002
关键词
Backtesting; Banking regulation; Expected shortfall; Financial risk management; Statistical test; Value-at-Risk
资金
- Seventh Framework Programme European Union for research, technological development and demonstration [318984]
Under the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, capital charges are based on the coherent Expected Shortfall (ES) risk measure, which is sensitive to tail risk. We argue that backtesting of the forecasting models used to derive ES can be based on a multinomial test of Value-at-Risk (VaR) exceptions at several levels. Using simulation experiments with heavy-tailed distributions and GARCH volatility models, we design a statistical procedure to show that at least four VaR levels are required to obtain tests for misspecified trading book models that are more powerful than single-level (or even two-level) binomial exception tests. A traffic-light system for model approval is proposed and illustrated with three real-data examples spanning the 2008 financial crisis. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据