4.1 Article

Brazilian guidelines for the clinical management of paracoccidioidomycosis

期刊

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA MEDICINA TROPICAL
DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0230-2017

关键词

Paracoccidioidomycosis; Guidelines; Clinical management; Diagnosis; Treatment follow-up

资金

  1. Brazilian Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
  2. Brazilian Society of Infectology and Sociedade Paulista de Infectologia
  3. Departamento de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias da FMUSP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paracoccidioidomycosis is a systemic fungal disease occurring in Latin America that is associated with rural environments and agricultural activities. However, the incidence and prevalence of paracoccidiodomycosis is underestimated because of the lack of compulsory notification. If paracoccidiodomycosis is not diagnosed and treated early and adequately, the endemic fungal infection could result in serious sequelae. While the Paracoccidioides brasiliensis (P. brasiliensis) complex has been known to be the causal agent of paracoccidiodomycosis, a new species, Paracoccidioides lutzii (P. lutzii), has been reported in Rondonia, where the disease has reached epidemic levels, and in the Central West and Para. Accurate diagnoses and availability of antigens that are reactive with the patients' sera remain significant challenges. Therefore, the present guidelines aims to update the first Brazilian consensus on paracoccidioidomycosis by providing evidence-based recommendations for bedside patient management. This consensus summarizes etiological, ecoepidemiological, molecular epidemiological, and immunopathological data, with emphasis on clinical, microbiological, and serological diagnosis and management of clinical forms and sequelae, as well as in patients with comorbidities and immunosuppression. The consensus also includes discussion of outpatient treatments, severe disease forms, disease prevalence among special populations and resource-poor settings, a brief review of prevention and control measures, current challenges and recommendations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据