4.1 Article

Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00015

关键词

meaningful human control; autonomous weapon systems; responsibility gap; ethics of robotics; responsible innovation in robotics; value-sensitive design in robotics; AI ethics; ethics of autonomous systems

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Debates on lethal autonomous weapon systems have proliferated in the past 5 years. Ethical concerns have been voiced about a possible raise in the number of wrongs and crimes in military operations and about the creation of a responsibility gap for harms caused by these systems. To address these concerns, the principle of meaningful human control has been introduced in the legal-political debate; according to this principle, humans not computers and their algorithms should ultimately remain in control of, and thus morally responsible for, relevant decisions about (lethal) military operations. However, policy-makers and technical designers lack a detailed theory of what meaningful human control exactly means. In this paper, we lay the foundation of a philosophical account of meaningful human control, based on the concept of guidance control as elaborated in the philosophical debate on free will and moral responsibility. Following the ideals of Responsible Innovation and Value-sensitive Design, our account of meaningful human control is cast in the form of design requirements. We identify two general necessary conditions to be satisfied for an autonomous system to remain under meaningful human control: first, a tracking condition, according to which the system should be able to respond to both the relevant moral reasons of the humans designing and deploying the system and the relevant facts in the environment in which the system operates; second, a tracing condition, according to which the system should be designed in such a way as to grant the possibility to always trace back the outcome of its operations to at least one human along the chain of design and operation. As we think that meaningful human control can be one of the central notions in ethics of robotics and AI, in the last part of the paper, we start exploring the implications of our account for the design and use of non-military autonomous systems, for instance, self-driving cars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据