4.4 Article

Have mangrove restoration projects worked? An in-depth study in Sri Lanka

期刊

RESTORATION ECOLOGY
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 705-716

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rec.12492

关键词

climate zones; field survey; Indian Ocean tsunami; level of survival; mangrove restoration; Sri Lanka

类别

资金

  1. VLIR-UOS (Flemish Interuniversity Council - University Development Cooperation) [ZEIN2008PR347]
  2. University Grant commission, Sri Lanka [UGC/DRIC/UGC/DRIC/PG/2014AUG/RUH/02]
  3. Faculty of Science, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka [RU/SF/RP/2015/02]
  4. Fondation Wiener Anspach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effectiveness of mangrove planting initiatives in Sri Lanka. All the lagoons and estuaries in Sri Lanka were included in the study. We documented all agencies and locations, involved in mangrove planting efforts, along with the major drivers of these planting initiatives, their extents, and the possible causes of the success or failure of planting. An adapted three-step framework and a field survey consisting of vegetation and soil surveys and questionnaires were used to evaluate the objectives. We found that about 1,000-1,200ha of mangroves, representing 23 project sites with 67 planting efforts, have been under restoration with the participation of several governmental and nongovernmental organizations. However, about 200-220ha showed successful mangrove restoration. Nine out of 23 project sites (i.e. 36/67 planting efforts) showed no surviving plants. The level of survival of the restoration project sites ranged from 0 to 78% and only three sites, that is, Kalpitiya, Pambala, and Negombo, showed a level of survival higher than 50%. Survival rates were significantly correlated with post-care. Planting mangrove seedlings at the incorrect topography often entails inappropriate soil conditions for mangroves. Survival rates showed significant correlations with a range of soil parameters except soil pH. Disturbance and stress caused by cattle trampling, browsing, algal accumulation, and insect attacks, factors that may themselves relate to choosing sites with inappropriate topography and hydrology, were common to most sites. The findings are a stark illustration of the frequent mismatch between the purported aims of restoration initiatives and the realities on the ground.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据