4.7 Article

A UV-to-NIR Study of Molecular Gas in the Dust Cavity around RY Lupi

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 855, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf65

关键词

ISM: molecules; protoplanetary disks; stars: pre-main sequence

资金

  1. HST-GO program [14469, 14703]
  2. NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship [80NSSC17K0531]
  3. ESA Research Fellowship
  4. ESO Fellowships
  5. Netherlands Research School for Astronomy (NOVA)
  6. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) professor prize
  7. European Union A-ERC grant [291141 CHEMPLAN]
  8. project PRIN-INAF The Cradle of Life-GENESIS-SKA (General Conditions in Early Planetary Systems for the rise of life with SKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a study of molecular gas in the inner disk (r < 20 au) around RY Lupi, with spectra from HST-COS, HST-STIS, and VLT-CRIRES. We model the radial distribution of flux from hot gas in a surface layer between r = 0.1-10 au, as traced by Ly alpha-pumped H-2. The result shows H-2 emission originating in a ring centered at similar to 3 au that declines within r < 0.1 au, which is consistent with the behavior of disks with dust cavities. An analysis of the H-2 line shapes shows that a two-component Gaussian profile (FWHMbroad, (H2) = 105 +/- 15 km s(-1); FWHMnarrow, (H2) = 43 +/- 13 km s(-1)) is statistically preferred to a single-component Gaussian. We interpret this as tentative evidence for gas emitting from radially separated disk regions (< r(broad), (H2)> similar to 0.4 +/- 0.1 au; < r(narrow), (H2)> similar to 3 +/- 2 au). The 4.7 mu m (CO)-C-12 emission lines are also well fit by two-component profiles (< r(broad), (CO)> = 0.4 +/- 0.1 au; < r(narrow), (CO)> = 15 +/- 2 au). We combine these results with 10 mu m observations to form a picture of gapped structure within the mm-imaged dust cavity, providing the first such overview of the inner regions of a young disk. The HST SED of RY Lupi is available online for use in modeling efforts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据