4.4 Article

Survival and consciousness recovery are better in the minimally conscious state than in the vegetative state

期刊

BRAIN INJURY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 72-77

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1364421

关键词

Clinical; DOC patients; outcomes; prognosis

资金

  1. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  2. programme 'Investissements d'avenir' [ANR-10-IAIHU-06]
  3. 'ANR-CogniComa'
  4. ANR [14-CE15-0013-04]
  5. 'Recovery of consciousness after severe brain injury Phase II' grant of the James S. McDonnell Foundation
  6. Grand Prix Lamonica de Neurologie (Academie des Sciences)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The prognosis value of early clinical diagnosis of consciousness impairment is documented by an extremely limited number of studies, whereas it may convey important information to guide medical decisions. Objective: We aimed at determining if patients diagnosed at an early stage (< 90 days after brain injury) as being in the minimally conscious state (MCS) have a better prognosis than patients in the vegetative state/Unresponsive Wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS), independent of care limitations or withdrawal decisions. Methods: Patients hospitalized in ICUs of the Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital (Paris, France) from November 2008 to January 2011 were included and evaluated behaviourally with standardized assessment and with the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised as being either in the VS/UWS or in the MCS. They were then prospectively followed until 1July 2011 to evaluate their outcome with the GOSE. We compared survival function and outcomes of these two groups. Results: Both survival function and outcomes, including consciousness recovery, were significantly better in the MCS group. This difference of outcome still holds when considering only patients still alive at the end of the study. Conclusions: Early accurate clinical diagnosis of VS/UWS or MCS conveys a strong prognostic value of survival and of consciousness recovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据