4.6 Article

A Comprehensive Comparison of Relativistic Particle Integrators

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab114

关键词

acceleration of particles; methods: numerical; plasmas; relativistic processes

资金

  1. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme by the Belgian Science Policy Office [IAP P7/08 CHARM]
  2. KU Leuven
  3. Space Weaves RUN project
  4. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) [12Q6117N, 12C2716N]
  5. ERC [610058]
  6. DoE [DE-SC0016542]
  7. NASA Fermi [NNX16AR75G]
  8. NASA ATP [NNX-17AG21G]
  9. NSF [ACI-1657507, AST-1716567]
  10. [GOA/2015-014]
  11. NASA [NNX16AR75G, 895490] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compare relativistic particle integrators commonly used in plasma physics, showing several test cases relevant for astrophysics. Three explicit particle pushers are considered, namely, the Boris, Vay, and Higuera-Cary schemes. We also present a new relativistic fully implicit particle integrator that is energy conserving. Furthermore, a method based on the relativistic guiding center approximation is included. The algorithms are described such that they can be readily implemented in magnetohydrodynamics codes or Particle-in-Cell codes. Our comparison focuses on the strengths and key features of the particle integrators. We test the conservation of invariants of motion and the accuracy of particle drift dynamics in highly relativistic, mildly relativistic, and non-relativistic settings. The methods are compared in idealized test cases, i.e., without considering feedback onto the electrodynamic fields, collisions, pair creation, or radiation. The test cases include uniform electric and magnetic fields, E x B fields, force-free fields, and setups relevant for high-energy astrophysics, e.g., a magnetic mirror, a magnetic dipole, and a magnetic null. These tests have direct relevance for particle acceleration in shocks and in magnetic reconnection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据