4.5 Article

Diagnostic implications of positive avian serology in suspected hypersensitivity pneumonitis

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 173-178

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.06.019

关键词

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis; Avian serology; Bird-fancier's disease; Interstitial lung disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The diagnostic evaluation of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) often involves serologic assessment for identifiable causes such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). While not on its own defining of HP, precipitin serologies are often obtained to support clinical suspicion if other findings are inconclusive. We studied the clinical relevance of positive avian serology in patients undergoing ILD evaluation. Material and methods: We identified individuals with positive avian serology (>53.3 mg/L) and undifferentiated ILD seen at our institution over a three-year period. Clinical, laboratory, pathologic, and radiologic findings were evaluated for consensus HP diagnosis by two expert pulmonologists, blinded to presenting serology levels. Results: Ninety-one ILD subjects with positive avian serology were identified; Mean age was 62.7 +/- 15.3 years with a slight male predominance (56%). Forty-nine (54%) received a consensus HP diagnosis. Those with HP had higher mean avian serology titer (95.0 +/- 38.7 mg/L vs. 68.3 +/- 16.7, (P < 0.0001). Never smokers also had higher titers compared to prior or active smokers (P = 0.0008). Positive avian protein exposure (P < 0.0001, OR 21.3 (6.4-87)), DLCO% (P = 0.04, unit OR 0.96 (0.92-0.99)), and increasing serology titer (P < 0.015, unit OR 1.03 [1.01-1.06]) were independent predictors of HP diagnosis. Conclusion: Among patients with positive avian serology, those with higher titers were more likely to have HP diagnosis. Nonsmokers also manifested higher titers compared to those with smoking history. These results may guide the usage and interpretation of avian serology screening in the initial assessment of suspected HP. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据