4.7 Article

Can social media be a tool for reducing consumers' food waste? A behaviour change experiment by a UK retailer

期刊

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 195-203

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.016

关键词

Food waste; Retailer; Behaviour change; Social influence; Social media; Consumer

资金

  1. Innovate UK
  2. UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  3. Asda
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L011891/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. ESRC [ES/L011891/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports on a landmark study to field-test the influence of a large retailer to change the behaviour of its millions of customers. Previous studies have suggested that social media interaction can influence behaviour. This study implemented three interventions with messages to encourage reductions in food waste. The first was a social influence intervention that used the retailer's Facebook pages to encourage its customers to interact. Two additional,information interventions were used as a comparison through the retailer's print/digital magazine and e-newsletter. Three national surveys tracked customers' self reported food waste one month before as well as two weeks after and five months after the interventions. The control group included those who said they had not seen any of the interventions. The results were surprising and significant in that the social media and e-newsletter interventions as well as the control group all showed significant reductions in self-reported food waste by customers over the study period. Hence in this field study, social media does not seem to replicate enough of the effect of 'face-to-face' interaction shown in previous studies to change behaviour above other factors in the shopping setting. This may indicate that results from laboratory-based studies may over-emphasise the effect of social media interventions. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据