4.6 Article

Kinetic Implications of the Presence of Intermolecular Interactions in the Response of Binary Self-Assembled Electroactive Monolayers

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 1276-1292

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01995

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacion Seneca de la Region de Murcia [19887/GERM/15]
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CTQ-2015-65243-P, CTQ-201571955-REDT]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantitative analysis of the influence of intermolecular interactions on the response of electroactive binary monolayers, incorporating the presence of electro-inactive coadsorbed species and Marcus-Hush kinetic formalism, has been deduced as an extension of previous models. An expression for the current-potential relationship in terms of two global phenomenological interaction parameters and the apparent charge-transfer rate constant and formal potential has been obtained and applied to multipotential chronoamperometry for the analysis of intermolecular interaction effects on the kinetics of the charge transfer. Experimental verification of the theoretical framework has been performed with binary ferrocenylundecanethiol/decanethiol monolayers on gold and platinum substrates for different coverage degrees of the redox probe. The increase of the ferrocene coverage gives rise to a slowing down of the charge-transfer process through a decrease of the apparent rate constant above a 90% for gold and platinum electrodes when the surface coverage increases from 1-2 to 15-30%. Significant differences in the magnitude of intermolecular interactions and the symmetry degree of the charge-transfer process are observed between gold and platinum electrodes. Moreover, for high surface coverages of ferrocene, two different domains appear, from which it is possible to carry out a kinetic discrimination of the two responses. Values of the interaction and kinetic parameters have been obtained for the different monolayers under study, and the limit of applicability of this treatment is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据