4.7 Review

Glacial seismology

期刊

REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS
卷 80, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/aa8473

关键词

glaciers; seismology; geophysics; climate change

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. NSF Office of Polar Programs [0632230, 0632239, 0652322, 0632335, 0632136, 0632209, 0632185]
  3. NSF Office of Polar Program [1141889]
  4. NSF (POLENET)
  5. Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR)
  6. International Glaciological Society (IGS)
  7. International Association of Cryospheric Sciences (IACS)
  8. Directorate For Geosciences
  9. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0632209, 0632239, 0632185, 1141889] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Directorate For Geosciences
  11. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0632136, 0632335] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seismic source and wave propagation studies contribute to understanding structure, transport, fracture mechanics, mass balance, and other processes within glaciers and surrounding environments. Glaciogenic seismic waves readily couple with the bulk Earth, and can be recorded by seismographs deployed at local to global ranges. Although the fracturing, ablating, melting, and/or highly irregular environment of active glaciers can be highly unstable and hazardous, informative seismic measurements can commonly be made at stable proximal ice or rock sites. Seismology also contributes more broadly to emerging studies of elastic and gravity wave coupling between the atmosphere, oceans, solid Earth, and cryosphere, and recent scientific and technical advances have produced glaciological/seismological collaborations across a broad range of scales and processes. This importantly includes improved insight into the responses of cryospheric systems to changing climate and other environmental conditions. Here, we review relevant fundamental physics and glaciology, and provide a broad review of the current state of glacial seismology and its rapidly evolving future directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据