4.7 Article

Effects of urban density on carbon dioxide exchanges: Observations of dense urban, suburban and woodland areas of southern England

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 198, 期 -, 页码 186-200

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.12.031

关键词

Carbon emissions; Emissions inventory; Human impact; Land use change; Net ecosystem exchange

资金

  1. EUFP7 [211345]
  2. NERC [H003231/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/I00159X/1, EP/I00159X/2]
  4. King's College London (London)
  5. Natural Environment Research Council, UK (Swindon)
  6. Forestry Commission (Alice Holt)
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I00159X/1, EP/I00159X/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H003231/1, 948262, ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. EPSRC [EP/I00159X/1, EP/I00159X/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. NERC [NE/H003231/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anthropogenic and biogenic controls on the surface atmosphere exchange of CO2 are explored for three different environments. Similarities are seen between suburban and woodland sites during summer, when photosynthesis and respiration determine the diurnal pattern of the CO2 flux. In winter, emissions from human activities dominate urban and suburban fluxes; building emissions increase during cold weather, while traffic is a major component of CO2 emissions all year round. Observed CO2 fluxes reflect diurnal traffic patterns (busy throughout the day (urban); rush-hour peaks (suburban)) and vary between working days and non-working days, except at the woodland site. Suburban vegetation offsets some anthropogenic emissions, but 24-h CO2 fluxes are usually positive even during summer. Observations are compared to estimated emissions from simple models and inventories. Annual CO2 exchanges are significantly different between sites, demonstrating the impacts of increasing urban density (and decreasing vegetation fraction) on the CO2 flux to the atmosphere. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据