4.8 Review

Technology overview of biogas production in anaerobic digestion plants: A European evaluation of research and development

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 44-53

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.079

关键词

Biogas; Technology prospection; Anaerobic digestion; Organic waste; Renewable energy

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico Brazil
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Spain) [CTM2015-69513-R]
  4. TECNIOspring fellowship programme [TECSPR15-1-0051]
  5. European Union through the Marie Curie Actions
  6. ACCIO [TECSPR15-1-0051 Generalitat de Catalunya]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anaerobic digestion (AD) technology is used commercially around the world, especially in Europe, which has set some challenging targets to diversify its energy mix with more renewable energy. This study intends to demonstrate, through technology prospecting, the relation between academic research (published articles) and technology development (patent applications) evolved from 1990 to 2015. Published articles were classified under the topics and wastes they cover, which include manure, agricultural and food waste, wastewater, sewage sludge and the organic fraction of municipal solid waste, with the last of these often being associated with co-digestion processes. Meanwhile, the patents in the area are mostly for equipment of the AD process and new methods or means of purifying the biogas obtained. It was found that the patents filed in Europe tend to protect their innovations only occasionally in countries outside the EU. Germany is the clear leader in all the areas of research and the commercial applications of the technologies, followed by Italy, Spain and Sweden. This study also demonstrates the immense potential of biogas throughout Europe, not just for energy generation, but also as a fuel and a by-product of the treatment of different kinds of waste.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据