4.8 Review

Phase equilibrium in the design of phase change materials for thermal energy storage: State-of-the-art

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 558-581

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.108

关键词

Thermal energy storage (TES); Phase change material (PCM); Phase equilibrium; Phase diagram; Congruent melting; Eutectic; Peritectic

资金

  1. Swedish Energy Agency [34948-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a review of phase equilibrium as a tool for accurately identifying suitable blended phase change materials (PCMs) to be used for thermal energy storage (TES). PCM storage increases the overall energy efficiency for many applications, however, high cost and complex phase change phenomena in blends often undermine the benefits. The study of phase equilibrium as derived from phase diagrams is the key to solve these issues. It enables the evaluation of PCM-suitability through indication of temperature-composition points, e.g. congruent melting compositions, eutectics and peritectics. To clearly stake out the opportunities of a phase equilibrium-based design methodology, this paper reviews the state-of-the-art based on findings from four decades (1977-2016). On one hand, eutectics, salts-based systems, fatty acids, and alkanes dominate the existing PCM literature. Here peritectics have often been erroneously praised as suitable PCMs despite the many problems depicted from a phase equilibrium point of view. On the other hand, the most PCM-ideal congruent melting systems, as well as the blends of polyols, fats, metal alloys and organic-inorganic combinations lack full attention. This work brings forward the knowledge on these insufficiently explored yet extremely suitable phase equilibrium characteristics. In addition, comprehensive PCM-design thermal properties of these various blends are presented, as a basis to further extensive explorations, and material category-based predictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据