4.8 Review

Optimal design of hybrid PV-Diesel-Battery systems for isolated lands: A case study for Kilis, Turkey

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 344-352

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.037

关键词

Hybrid PV-Diesel-Battery systems; Isolated Island; Kilis; Turkey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to supply electricity energy via a hybrid PV(photovoltaic)-Diesel-Battery for a summer house which is located remotely from the grid connection in Kills province of southern Turkey (Latitude: 36 degrees 43', Longitude: 37 degrees 07', Altitude: 664 m). Summer houses are widespread in this area, and it is impossible for these buildings to benefit from grid connection. Optimal sizing of hybrid PV-Diesel-Battery systems prove to be very economical as an energy source for these houses. The optimization demonstrated that the lowest investment cost was 12,400 Turkish liras, and renewable energy part of the proposed system was calculated as 79%. In this respect, the system was optimally sized with a PV of 3 kW, a diesel:generator of 1 kW, a converter of 2 kW and 6 units of battery. PV panels and diesel generator generate 4248 and 773 kW h/year, respectively, which amounts to 5021 kW h/year. This is a Hybrid PV-Diesel-Battery system. It consists of renewable (PV System) and non-renewable (Diesel Generator) energy sources. Therefore, this paper focuses on optimal sizing of the proposed system. Total annual energy demand is 2353.8 kW h/year, and the remaining amount is stored in the batteries. Total renewable production divided by load, total renewable production divided by generation, and renewable energy part of the proposed system are 116.38%, 84.6%, and %79, respectively. In, addition to its cost effective energy supply, the system is also environment-friendly. Hybrid PV-Diesel-Battery system prevented 44.024 tCO(2), 123.39 kg of CO, 13.471 kg of UHCs, 9.16 kg of PM, 90.52 kg of SO2 and 1100.33 kg of NOx. This study can also be adapted for other cities and regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据