4.5 Article

Abundance and diversity of aerobic heterotrophic microorganisms and their interaction with cyanobacteria in the oxic layer of an intertidal hypersaline cyanobacterial mat

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
卷 94, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fix183

关键词

cyanobacterial mats; aerobic heterotrophs; archaea; qPCR; CARD-FISH; Cyanobacteria

资金

  1. Hansewissenschaftskolleg (HWK)
  2. Max Planck Society
  3. Hansewissenschaftskolleg (HWK)
  4. Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aerobic heterotrophic microorganisms (AH) play a significant role in carbon cycling in cyanobacterial mats; however, little is known about their abundance, diversity and interaction with cyanobacteria. Using catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH), bacterial counts in the mat's oxic layer reached a mean of 2.23 +/- 0.4 x 10(10) cells g(-1). Cultivation of AH yielded strains belonging to Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Gammaproteobacteria and Haloarchaea. 16S rRNA bacterial sequences retrieved from the mat's oxic layer were related to Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi and Proteobacteria, whereas archaeal sequences belonged to Crenarchaeota and Haloarchaea. Monocultures of cyanobacteria from the same mat were associated with different AH, although Bacteroidetes were found in most cultures. CARD-FISH showed that Bacteroidetes- and Chloroflexi-related bacteria were closely associated with filaments of Microcoleus chthonoplastes. The growth of an axenic culture of M. chthonoplastes PCC7420 was stimulated on the addition of a filtrate obtained from a non-axenic Microcoleus culture and containing only AH and released substances. In contrast, a similar filtrate from a non-axenic Cyanothece-related culture killed Cyanothece PCC 7418. We conclude that a diverse community of AH exist in close association with cyanobacteria in microbial mats and the interactions between AH and cyanobacteria are species-specific and involve the release of substances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据