4.6 Article

Maltose-Functionalized Hydrophilic Magnetic Nanoparticles with Polymer Brushes for Highly Selective Enrichment of N-Linked Glycopeptides

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 1572-1580

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01788

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21475067]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [15JCYBJC20600]
  3. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) [2017-I2M-3-019, 2016-I2M-3-022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient enrichment glycoproteins/glycopeptides from complex biological solutions are very important in the biomedical sciences, in particular biomarker research. In this work, the high hydrophilic polyethylenimine conjugated polymaltose polymer brushes functionalized magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) denoted as Fe3O4-PEI-pMaltose were designed and synthesized via a simple two-step modification. The obtained superhydrophilic Fe3O4-PEI-pMaltose NPs displayed outstanding advantages in the enrichment of N-linked glycopeptides, including high selectivity (1: 100, mass ratios of HRP and bovine serum albumin (BSA) digest), low detection limit (10 fmol), large binding capacity (200 mg/g), and high enrichment recovery (above 85%). The above-mentioned excellent performance of novel Fe3O4-PEI-pMaltose NPs was attributed to graft of maltose polymer brushes and efficient assembly strategy. Moreover, Fe3O4-PEI-pMaltose NPs were further utilized to selectively enrich glycopeptides from human renal mesangial cell (HRMC, 200 mu g) tryptic digest, and 449 N-linked glycopeptides, representing 323 different glycoproteins and 476 glycosylation sites, were identified. It was expected that the as-synthesized Fe3O4-PEI-pMaltose NPs, possessing excellent performance (high binding capacity, good selectivity, low detection limit, high enrichment recovery, and easy magnetic separation) coupled to a facile preparation procedure, have a huge potential in N-glycosylation proteome analysis of complex biological samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据