4.7 Article

Automatic tree species recognition with quantitative structure models

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 1-12

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.002

关键词

Tree species recognition; Terrestrial laser scanning; Quantitative structure model; Tree reconstruction

资金

  1. Academy of Finland research projects Centre of Excellence [284715]
  2. Challenges of forest management in the changing environment [292930]
  3. Resource utilization pattern of wood-inhabiting fungi [292899]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present three robust methods to accurately and automatically recognize tree species from terrestrial laser scanner data. The recognition is based on the use of quantitative structure tree models, which are hierarchical geometric primitive models accurately approximating the branching structure, geometry, and volume of the trees. Fifteen robust tree features are presented and tested with all different combinations for tree species classification. The classification methods presented are k-nearest neighbours, multinomial regression, and support vector machine based approaches. Three mainly single-species forest plots of Silver birch, Scots pine and Norway spruce, and two mixed-species forest plots located in Finland and a total number of trees over 1200 were used for demonstration. The results show that by using single species forest plots for training and testing, it is possible to find a feature combination between 5 and 15 features, that results in an average classification accuracy above 93% for all the methods. For the preliminary mixed-species forest plot testing, accuracy was lower but the classification approach presented potential to generalize to more diverse cases. Moreover, the results show that the post-processing of terrestrial laser scanning data of multi-hectare forest, from tree extraction and modelling to species classification, can be done automatically. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据