4.5 Article

Arctic hydroclimate variability during the last 2000 years: current understanding and research challenges

期刊

CLIMATE OF THE PAST
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 473-514

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/cp-14-473-2018

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation
  3. Swedish Research Council (VR) [2012-05246, 2015-04031]
  4. Academy of Finland [288267]
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2014-05810, 2014-03885]
  6. French Ministry
  7. UK NERC [NEB501504, NE/P011527/1]
  8. EU [017008]
  9. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2014-327]
  10. Division Of Earth Sciences
  11. Directorate For Geosciences [1440015] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Swedish Research Council [2015-04031, 2012-05246] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  13. NERC [NE/P011527/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reanalysis data show an increasing trend in Arctic precipitation over the 20th century, but changes are not homogenous across seasons or space. The observed hydro-climate changes are expected to continue and possibly accelerate in the coming century, not only affecting pan-Arctic natural ecosystems and human activities, but also lower latitudes through the atmospheric and ocean circulations. However, a lack of spatiotemporal observational data makes reliable quantification of Arctic hydroclimate change difficult, especially in a long-term context. To understand Arctic hydroclimate and its variability prior to the instrumental record, climate proxy records are needed. The purpose of this review is to summarise the current understanding of Arctic hydroclimate during the past 2000 years. First, the paper reviews the main natural archives and proxies used to infer past hydroclimate variations in this remote region and outlines the difficulty of disentangling the moisture from the temperature signal in these records. Second, a comparison of two sets of hydroclimate records covering the Common Era from two data-rich regions, North America and Fennoscandia, reveals inter- and intra-regional differences. Third, building on earlier work, this paper shows the potential for providing a high-resolution hydroclimate reconstruction for the Arctic and a comparison with last-millennium simulations from fully coupled climate models. In general, hydroclimate proxies and simulations indicate that the Medieval Climate Anomaly tends to have been wetter than the Little Ice Age (LIA), but there are large regional differences. However, the regional coverage of the proxy data is inadequate, with distinct data gaps in most of Eurasia and parts of North America, making robust assessments for the whole Arctic impossible at present. To fully assess pan-Arctic hydroclimate variability for the last 2 millennia, additional proxy records are required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据