3.8 Article

Rhesus CE expression on patient red blood cells is an independent prognostic factor for adenocarcinoma of the lung

期刊

CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 1106-1117

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/crj.12638

关键词

adenocarcinoma; blood group; CNS metastasis; NSCLC; prognosis; RhCE; Rhesus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThe influence of blood group antigens on cancerogenesis is shown for distinct tumor types, yet the impact of Rhesus blood group antigens in lung cancer is not clarified. Materials and MethodsTo investigate the impact of Rhesus blood groups a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collective (n=1047) was analyzed retrospectively. Using a second cohort of n=340 primarily operated stage I-III NSCLC patients, we evaluated immunohistochemistry of CD47-antibody stained tissue samples in correlation to histopathologic subtype and Rhesus blood group. Results and ConclusionIn 516 of 1047 patients blood group data were available. Seven different RhCE phenotypes were grouped as ee, ccE, and CE. Adenocarcinoma patients with Rh ee revealed improved overall survival (29 (21.2-36.8) m; HR 1.00 [index]) compared with Rh ccE (19 (1.9-36.1) m; HR 1.76 [1.15-2.70]) and Rh CE (10 (7.4-12.6) m; HR 2.65 [1.70-4.12]) univariately (P <.001) and multivariately (P <.001). Rh ee showed reduced incidence of CNS-metastasis (P=.014) and metastasis count (P=.032) in stage IV adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry associated CD47-positivity with adenocarcinomas (n=340, P=.048). In n=51 cases blood group data were available. The prognostic effect of Rh ee compared with Rh ccE and Rh CE was stated (P=.001), foremost in CD47-positive adenocarcinomas (Rh ee vs. Rh ccE and Rh CE, P=.008). Inversely Rh ccE or Rh CE was found beneficial in CD47-negative non-adenocarcinomas (P=.046). Phenotypic RhCE expression may be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in adeno-NSCLC. We hypothesize an erythrocytic-immunologic interaction with tumor tissue, possibly altered by RhCE and CD47, resulting in a metastatic prone condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据