4.5 Article

Fertility impairment with defective spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis in male zebrafish lacking androgen receptor

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 227-238

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/biolre/iox165

关键词

androgen receptor; fertility; spermatogenesis; steroidogenesis; zebrafish

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31701302, 31372512]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2017A030310312]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [17lgpy108]
  4. Research Grant Council of Hong Kong [463013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pivotal role of androgen receptor (AR) in regulating male fertility has attracted much research attention in the past two decades. Previous studies have shown that total AR knockout would lead to incomplete spermatogenesis and lowered serum testosterone levels in mice, resulting in azoospermia and infertility. However, the precise physiological role of ar in controlling fertility of male fish is still poorly understood. In this study, we have established an ar knockout zebrafish line by transcription activator-like effectors nucleases. Homozygous ar mutant male fish with smaller testis size were found to be infertile when tested by natural mating. Intriguingly, a small amount of mature spermatozoa was observed in the ar mutant fish. These mature spermatozoa could fertilize healthy oocytes, albeit with a lower fertilization rate, by in vitro fertilization. Moreover, the expression levels of most steroidogenic genes in the testes were significantly elevated in the ar mutants. In contrast, the levels of estradiol and 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT) were significantly decreased in the ar mutants, indicating that steroidogenesis was defective in the mutants. Furthermore, the protein level of LH beta in the serum decreased markedly in the ar mutants when compared with wild-type fish, probably due to the positive feedback from the diminished steroid hormone levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据