4.7 Article

Controllable synthesis and antimicrobial activities of acrylate polymers containing quaternary ammonium salts

期刊

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 110-118

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2017.10.010

关键词

Acrylate polymers containing quaternary ammonium salts; Atom transfer radical polymerization; Antimicrobial activity; Bacterial; Phytopathogenic fungi

资金

  1. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [201704020084]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2016A020210105]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31201552]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of acrylate polymers containing quaternary ammonium salts (PDMAEMA-BC) having tunable molecular weights were synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATBP), and the effect of the degree of polymerization (DP) on the antimicrobial activity against bacteria (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus albus), pathogenic fungi (Candida albicans) and phytopathogenic fungi (Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4) was systematically assessed. The antimicrobial properties against E. coli, S. albus and C. albicans were characterized using the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) or minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values, whereas the antimicrobial activities against R. solani and Foc4 were evaluated using the effective concentration (EC50 and EC90), MIC and MFC values. The results indicated that the PDMAEMA-BC homopolymers showed better antimicrobial activities than the corresponding monomer, i.e., the acrylate quaternary ammonium salt monomer (DMAEMA-BC), and the optimal antimicrobial activities were obtained for moderate PDMAEMA-BC chain lengths. These results help to understand the antimicrobial mechanism of polymeric quaternary ammonium salts and highlight their potential application as fungicidal agents for controlling both human and plant diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据