4.7 Article

Effect of ionic and covalent crosslinking agents on properties of chitosan beads and sorption effectiveness of Reactive Black 5 dye

期刊

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 58-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2017.03.007

关键词

Chitosan; Crosslinldng; Covalent crosslinking agents; Ionic crosslinking agents; Reactive Black 5

资金

  1. National Science Centre [DEC-2011/03/N/ST8/04006]
  2. Foundation for Polish Science (FNP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared properties of hydrogel chitosan sorbents crosslinked with eight agents, including four ionic ones: sodium citrate, sodium tripolyphosphate, sulfosuccinic acid, and oxalic add and four covalent ones: glutaraldehyde, epichlorohydrin, trimethylpropane triglycidyl ether, and ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether. The effect of crosslinking process conditions (pH, temperature) and dose of the crosslinking agent on chitosan sorbent stability during sorption and on the effectiveness of Reactive Black 5 dye sorption were examined. The optimal parameters of crosslinldng ensuring sorbent stability in acidic solutions and high sorption capability were established for each crosslinking agent tested. The susceptibility of crosslinked sorbents to mechanical damages was analyzed as well. The process of ionic crosslinking was the most effective at the pH value below which hydrogel chitosan sorbent began to dissolve (pH 4). The crosslinking temperature ranging from 25 to 60 degrees C had no effect upon sorbent stability. The higher temperature during ionic crosslinldng, however, slightly decreased RB5 sorption effectiveness. The ionic crosslinking significantly decrease the susceptibility of chitosan hydrogels to mechanical damages. In the case of covalent crosslinking of chitosan hydrogel beads, the effect of process conditions (pH, temperature) on the properties of the crosslinked sorbent depended on the type of crosslinking agent. The sorbents crosslinked with covalent agents were usually harder but also more fragile, and therefore more susceptible to mechanical damages. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据