期刊
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 123, 期 1, 页码 63-70出版社
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.02.005
关键词
GTV; CTV; Pathology Head and neck cancer; Imaging
资金
- Dutch Cancer Society [UU 2011-5152, UU 2011-5216]
Background and purpose: The goal of this study was to improve target definition by deriving modality specific margins for clinical target volumes (CTV) for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer on CT, MRI and 18-FDG-PET. Material arid methods: Twenty-five patients with T3/T4 laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer underwent CT, MRI and 18-FDG-PET scans before laryngectomy. HE-sections were obtained from the surgical specimen and tumor was delineated (tumorHE). The GTVs on CT and MRI were delineated in consensus. PET-based GTVs were automatically segmented. The three-dimensionally reconstructed specimen was registered to the various images. Modality-specific CTV margins were derived and added to the GTVs to achieve adequate tumor coverage. The resulting CTVs were compared with each other, to tumorHE, and to CTVCT10 constructed on CT with the clinical margin of 10 mm. Results: CTV margins of 4.3 mm (CT), 6.1 mm (MRI) and 5.2 mm (PET) were needed to achieve adequate tumor coverage. The median volumes of the resulting modality-specific CTVs were 44 ml (CT), 48 ml (MRI) and 39 ml (PET), while the CTV10mm was 80 ml. Conclusion: For laryngohypopharyngeal tumors, 45-52% target volume reduction compared with CTVlomm is achievable when modality-specific CTV margins are used. PET-based CTVs were significantly smaller compared to CT- and MRI-based CTVs. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据