4.6 Article

A Decade of MWC 758 Disk Images: Where Are the Spiral-arm-driving Planets?

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 857, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab7f5

关键词

protoplanetary disks; stars: imaging; stars: individual (MWC 758)

资金

  1. State of Maryland grant
  2. NASA through Hubble Fellowship by STScI [ST-HF2-51355]
  3. AURA, Inc. [NAS5-26555]
  4. NASA [HST-AR-12652, NNX15AD95G/NEXSS, NNX15AC89G, HST-GO-11136, HST-GO-13855, HST-GO-13331]
  5. NSF [AST-1518332]
  6. STScI Director's Discretionary Research funds
  7. AURA under NASA [NAS5-26555]
  8. NASA's Science Mission Directorate
  9. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1518332] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-scale spiral arms have been revealed in scattered light images of a few protoplanetary disks. Theoretical models suggest that such arms may be driven by and corotate with giant planets, which has called for remarkable observational efforts to look for them. By examining the rotation of the spiral arms for the MWC 758 system over a 10 year timescale, we are able to provide dynamical constraints on the locations of their perturbers. We present reprocessed Hubble Space Telescope (HST)/NICMOS F110W observations of the target in 2005, and the new Keck/NIRC2 L'-band observations in 2017. MWC. 758's two well-known spiral arms are revealed in the NICMOS archive at the earliest observational epoch. With additional Very Large Telescope (VLT)/SPHERE data, our joint analysis leads to a pattern speed of 0.6 degrees(+3.3 degrees)(-0.6 degrees) yr(-1) at 3 sigma for the two major spiral arms. If the two arms are induced by a perturber on a near-circular orbit, its best-fit orbit is at 89 au (0''.59), with a 3 sigma lower limit of 30 au (0 ''.20). This finding is consistent with the simulation prediction of the location of an arm-driving planet for the two major arms in the system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据