4.7 Article

The metalloproteinase-proteoglycans ADAMTS7 and ADAMTS12 provide an innate, tendon-specific protective mechanism against heterotopic ossification

期刊

JCI INSIGHT
卷 3, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.92941

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH (Program of Excellence in Glycoscience award) [HL107147, F32AR063548]
  2. David and Lindsay Morgenthaler Postdoctoral Fellowship
  3. American Heart Association-Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group Distinguished Investigator Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a significant clinical problem with incompletely resolved mechanisms. Here, the secreted metalloproteinases ADAMTS7 and ADAMTS12 are shown to comprise a unique proteoglycan class that protects against a tendency toward HO in mouse hindlimb tendons, menisci, and ligaments. Adamts7 and Adamts12 mRNAs were sparsely expressed in murine forelimbs but strongly coexpressed in hindlimb tendons, skeletal muscle, ligaments, and meniscal fibrocartilage. Adamts7(-/-) Adamts12(-/-) mice, but not corresponding single-gene mutants, which demonstrated compensatory upregulation of the intact homolog mRNA, developed progressive HO in these tissues after 4 months of age. Adamts7(-/-) Adamts12(-/-) tendons had abnormal collagen fibrils, accompanied by reduced levels of the small leucine-rich proteoglycans (SLRPs) biglycan, fibromodulin, and decorin, which regulate collagen fibrillogenesis. Bgn(-/0) Fmod(-/-) mice are known to have a strikingly similar hindlimb HO to that of Adamts7(-/-) Adamts12(-/-) mice, implicating fibromodulin and biglycan reduction as a likely mechanism underlying HO in Adamts7(-/-) Adamts12(-/-) mice. Interestingly, degenerated human biceps tendons had reduced ADAMTS7 mRNA compared with healthy biceps tendons, which expressed both ADAMTS7 and ADAMTS12. These results suggest that ADAMTS7 and ADAMTS12 drive an innate pathway protective against hindlimb HO in mice and may be essential for human tendon health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据